5 June 2018, first five member panel

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement Pfv.V.21.701/2016/10 of the Curia (obligation to pay forfeit money in case of withdrawal based on the law) (IV/1946/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. 8.Bf.392/2016/113 of the Budapest-Capital Regional Court of Appeal and Section 417(1)-(3) of the Act XIX of 1998 on the Criminal Procedure (other interested person who participated in the criminal procedure) (IV/1577/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. Mfv.II.10.145/2017/5 of the Curia (payment of remuneration difference) (IV/2175/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. Mfv.II.10.146/2017/5 of the Curia (payment of remuneration difference) (IV/2159/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. Mfv.II.10.140/2017/5 of the Curia (payment of remuneration difference) (IV/1976/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. Pfv.V.21.195/2016/6 of the Curia (contractor’s fee) (IV/1911/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the ruling No. 38.Kpk.45.853/2017/2 of the Budapest-Capital Administrative and Labour Court (judicial review of the tax authority’s ruling) (IV/2130/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the ruling No. 38.Kpk.45.854/2017/2 of the Budapest-Capital Administrative and Labour Court (judicial review of the tax authority’s ruling) (IV/2131/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the ruling No. 38.Kpk.45.855/2017/2 of the Budapest-Capital Administrative and Labour Court (judicial review of the tax authority’s ruling) (IV/2133/2017.)