25 June 2019, second five member panel

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. 1.Pf.21.370/2018/4 of the Nyíregyháza Regional Court (damages) (IV/457/2019.)

– examination of the posterior norm control against Section 1 p) to r), Section 31, Section 33, Section 34 (1), Section 35, Section 36, Section 37 and Section 38 of Nvt. incorporated in Section 30 (3) of the Act CCXXIV of 2015 on the amendment of certain Acts in the field of healthcare and health insurance, entering into force on 20 May 2016 (restriction of the rules on purchasing tobacco products, use of electric cigarette) (II/756/2016.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. 8.Pf.20.667/2018/5 of the Budapest-Capital Regional Court of Appeal (action for performing a request of data) (IV/1737/2018.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. Pfv.III.20.370/2018/6 of the Curia (damages) (IV/125/2019.)

– examination of the judicial initiative against Section 39/A (1) of the Act LXXXIII of 1997 on the Benefits of Mandatory Health Insurance (establishment of allowance for infant-care) (III/632/2019.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. Bfv.III.321/2017/25 of the Curia and Section 21 (3), Section 24 (3), Section 361 (1) and Section 362 (3) of the Act XIX of 1998 on the Criminal Procedure (extortion) (IV/109/2018.)

– examination of the constitutional complaint against the ruling No. 1.Bpkf.226/2017/2 of the Székesfehérvár Regional Court (compensation due to detention conditions) (IV/1833/2017.)