23 January 2018, plenary session

Agenda:

− Examination of the constitutional complaint aimed at establishing the lack of conformity with the Fundamental Law and annulling the interlocutory judgement No. Pfv.VI.21.031/2016/2 of the Curia (failure to hold a trial) (IV/1634/2016.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint aimed at establishing the lack of conformity with the Fundamental Law and annulling the ruling No. Bfv.III.169/2017/2 of the Curia (unfair procedure; entitlement of the supplementary private prosecutor to submit a motion for review) (IV/1060/2017.)

− Examination of the constitutional complaint aimed at establishing the lack of conformity with the Fundamental Law and annulling the ruling No. Bfv.I.1456/2014/4 of the Curia (sentencing) IV/987/2015.

-examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint aimed at establishing the lack of conformity with the Fundamental Law and annulling Section 3(5) of the Act CXII of 2011 on the Right of Informational Self-determination and the Freedom of Information and the judgement No. 2.Pf.20.123/2016/6/II of the Budapest-Capital Regional Court of Appeal (disclosing data of public interest) (IV/1510/2016.)

− Examination of the constitutional complaint against the ruling No. 22.Bpk.31.158/2015/3 of the Central District Court of Pest and the ruling No. 27.Bpkf.11.103/2015/2 of the Budapest-Capital Regional Court (slander) (IV/119/2016.)

23 January 2018, second five member panel

Agenda:

– examination of the Judicial initiative against Section 606/B para. (1) item c) of the Act XIX of 1998 on the Criminal Procedure (excluding a judge from the subsequent handling of the criminal case) (III/1989/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the ruling No. 2.Kpk.670.453/2017/4 of the Budapest-Capital Regional Court (local referendum case, party quarter, opening hours) (IV/2225/2017.)

– examination of the Constitutional complaint against the judgement No. Pfv.IV.20.750/2016/8 of the Curia (publicity of a policeman’s image) (IV/2057/2016.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. Mfv.III.10.659/2016/4 of the Curia (review of rehabilitation procedure) (IV/1225/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. Pfv.III.21.089/2016/8 of the Curia (damages against the State of Hungary) (IV/1409/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. Kfv.VI.35.734/2016/10 of the Curia (taxation) (IV/1332/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. Kfv.VI.35.715/2016/6 of the Curia (acquiring a direct qualifying holding of 20%) (IV/1566/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the ruling No. 7. Kpk.27.005/2016/10 of the Gyula Administrative and Labour Court and the ruling No. 9.Kpkf.25.133/2017/3 of the Gyula Regional Court (obligation to conduct an official public administration procedure, apiary) (IV/1356/2017.)

 

16 January 2018, Plenary Session

Agenda:

– examination of the constitutional complaint aimed at establishing the lack of conformity with the Fundamental Law and annulling the interlocutory judgement No. Pfv.VI.21.031/2016/2 of the Curia (failure to hold a trial) (IV/1634/2016.)

– examination of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. 13.Bhar.154/2016/15 of the Budapest-Capital Regional Court of Appeal (slander) (IV/1017/2017.)

– examination of the petition for posterior norm control submitted against Section 1 (2), Section 2 (2) and (5), Section 4 (2) of the Act LXXVI of 2017 on the Transparency of Organisations Receiving Foreign Funds and against Section 94 (1) h) and Section 95 e) of the Act CLXXXI of 2011 on the Court Registration of Civil Society Organisations and Related Rules of Proceeding (civil society organisation receiving foreign funds) (II/1460/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint aimed at establishing the lack of conformity with the Fundamental Law and annulling the ruling No. Bfv.III.169/2017/2 of the Curia (unfair procedure; entitlement of the supplementary private prosecutor to submit a motion for review) (IV/1060/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint aimed at establishing the lack of conformity with the Fundamental Law and annulling the ruling No. Pfv.IV.21.906/2016/3 of the Curia (violation of personality rights) (IV/1333/2017.)

16 January 2018, first five member panel

Agenda:

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the ruling No. 29.Szef.81/2016/2 of the Budapest-Capital Regional Court (failure to serve a ruling) (IV/749/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. Pfv.IV.21.425/2016/5 of the Curia (notification on handling personal data) (IV/1154/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the ruling No. 14.Bf.157/2016/19 of the Budapest-Capital Regional Court of Appeal (deduction of detention carried out abroad) (IV/1338/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the ruling No. 18.Bpkf.87/2017/2 of the Debrecen Regional Court (defamation) (IV/1452/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. Mfv.I.10.397/2016/4 of the Curia (delimitations of the application for review) (IV/1538/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the ruling No. 27.Bpkf.13.153/2016/2 of the Budapest-Capital Regional Court (misdemeanor of defamation) (IV/1010/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the ruling No. 22.Bpk.31.158/2015/3 of the Central District Court of Pest and the ruling No. 27.Bpkf.11.103/2015/2 of the Budapest-Capital Regional Court (slander) (IV/119/2016.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against Section 61/A of the Government Decree No. 290/2011. (XII. 22.) Korm. on the implementation of certain provisions of the Act CXIII of 2011 on National Defence and the Hungarian Defence Forces and on specific measures that may be implemented during any special legal order, and Section 1 of the Government Decree No. 457/2016. (XII. 23.) Korm. on the compensation of the staff of law enforcement bodies (damages of aggrieved parties in the BUDA-CASH case) (IV/1422/2017.)

16 January 2018, second five member panel

Agenda: 

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the ruling No. 3.Bf.1205/2015/8 of the Budapest Environs Regional Court (failure to take note of documentary evidence) (IV/1281/2016.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the ruling No. 5.Bnyf.264/2017/2 of the Szeged Regional Court (sequestration) (IV/1226/2017.)

– examination of the admission of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. Kfv.I.35.586/2016/6 of the Curia (taxation) (IV/1820/2017.)

– examination of the admission of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. 25.K.30.643/2015/10 of the Budapest-Capital Administrative and Labour Court and the judgement No. Kfv.V.35819/2015/11 of the Curia (taxation) (IV/260/2017.)

– examination of the admission of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. Pfv.IV.20.679/2016/5 of the Curia (disclosure of data of public interest) (IV/1926/2016.)

– examination of the judicial initiative against Section 606/B para. (1) item c) of the Act XIX of 1998 on the Criminal Procedure (excluding a judge from the subsequent handling of the criminal case) (III/1989/2017.)

– examination of the judicial initiative against Section 112 (1) of the Act CCIV of 2011 on the National Higher Education (termination of the student’s legal relation) (III/2074/2017.)

– examination of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. Pfv.IV.20.750/2016/8 of the Curia (publicity of a policeman’s image) (IV/2057/2016.)

16 January 2018, third five member panel

Agenda:

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against  Section 14 (10) of the Government Decree No. 43/1999. (III. 3.) Korm. on the  detailed rules of financing healthcare services from the Health Insurance Fund (overhead costs support for general practitioners) (IV/339/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. Gfv.VII.30.201/2015/6 of the Curia (rules of selling assets in the procedure of liquidation, economic entity of strategic importance) (IV/344/2016.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. 3.K.32.052/2015/5 of the Budapest-Capital Administrative and Labour Court (legal status of the client, verification of the entitlement to sue) (IV/355/2016.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the ruling No. 2.Mpkf.22.037/2016/2 of the Kaposvár Regional Court and against the decision No. 4/2003. PJE of the Curia (request for excuse) (IV/1008/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. Mfv.I.10.560/2015/4 of the Curia (dismissal without reasoning of a government official) (IV/1904/2016.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. 5.G.40.717/2012/84 of the Economic Judicial College of the Budapest-Capital Regional Court and judgement No. 13.Gf.40.167/2016/5-III. of the Budapest-Capital Regional Court of Appeal (obligatory purchase of a real estate) (IV/2111/2016.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. 5.G.40.717/2012/84 of the Economic Judicial College of the Budapest-Capital Regional Court and judgement No. 13.Gf.40.167/2016/5-III. of the Budapest-Capital Regional Court of Appeal (obligatory purchase of a real estate) (IV/571/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. 4.Pf.21.367/2016/4 of the Szolnok Regional Court (termination of execution, invalidity of contract) (IV/1421/2017.)