– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. Mfv.II.10.159/2018/6 of the Curia (establishing remuneration) (IV/416/2019.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. Kfv.VI.37.076/2018/9 of the Curia (building regulations) (IV/75/2019.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. Mfv.II.10.205/2018/5 of the Curia (payment of remuneration difference for a public employee) (IV/565/2019.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. Mfv.II.10.187/2018/6 of the Curia (payment of remuneration difference for a public employee) (IV/649/2019.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. Mfv.II.10.186/2018/4 of the Curia (payment of remuneration difference for a public employee) (IV/650/2019.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. Mfv.II.10.431/2018/4 of the Curia (payment of remuneration difference for a public employee) (IV/669/2019.)

– examination of the judicial initiative against Section 144 (2), Section 145 (3a), Section 165 (2) g), Section 165 (7b) and Section 197 (8) of the Act CXLIII of 2015 on Public Procurements (public procurement procedure; scope of competence of the Public Procurement Arbitration Board) (III/773/2019.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. Pfv.III.22.017/2017/21 of the Curia (payment of damages) (IV/19/2019.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the ruling Gfv.VII.30.166/2018/2 of the Curia (value of the subject matter of the action) (IV/1369/2018.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against Section 119 to 130 of the Act CLXII of 2011 on the Legal Status and the Remuneration of Judges as well as the decision No. SZfF.12/2015/10 of the Second Instance Service Court at the Curia and the the decision No. SZf20/45/2014 of the First Instance Service Court at the Regional Court of Appeal operating in the territory of Budapest (rules of procedure of the Service Court, proceeding with a disciplinary procedure) (IV/3363/2015.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the ruling No. 3.Bf.649/2017/13 of the Budapest Environs Regional Court (application for review by private prosecutor) (IV/1371/2018.)

– examination of the judicial initiative against Section 21 (4) of the Act LXII of 2009 on Mandatory Vehicle Liability Insurance (termination of mandatory vehicle liability insurance) (III/866/2019.)

examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the ruling Gfv.VII.30.082/2018/2 of the Curia (value of the subject matter of the action) (IV/1380/2018.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the ruling No. 57.Pkf.633.244/2018/7 of the Budapest-Capital Regional Court (invalidity of contract) (IV/1405/2018.)