16th February, third five-member panel

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. 15.P.20.432/2017/39 of the Székesfehérvár District Court and judgement No. 1.Pf.180/2018/40 of the Székesfehérvár Regional Court (effect of a barter contract regarding public road on the ownership title of a third person) (IV/831/2020.)

– examination of the constitutional complaint against the ruling No. 39.Kpk.46.505/2015/2 of the Budapest-Capital Administrative and Labour Court   and the text “no legal remedy is available against the ruling” in Section 144 (4) of the Act CVIII of 2011 on Public Procurements (public procurement, judicial review of administrative decisions) (IV/334/2016.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. Pfv.III.21.399/2018/4 of the Curia (damages caused in the court’s scope of competence) (IV/996/2020.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the ruling No. 4.Bv.386/2019/8-III of the Debrecen Regional Court Penal Group and the ruling No. 1.Bpkf.960/2019/2 of the Debrecen Regional Court (transformation of punishment from community service to imprisonment) (IV/788/2020.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the ruling No. 3.Bf.7/2020/9 of the Budapest-Capital Regional Court of Appeal (corruption of public officials) (IV/1258/2020.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the ruling No. Kfv.IV.35.241/2019/2 of the Curia (reclaiming support) (IV/1206/2019.)