Contacts
Client gate
HU
HU
  • Constitutional Court
  • Competences
  • Case law
  • Legal norms
  • Press
  • Data of public interest
  • About
    • Organisation
    • The office
    • History
  • Members of the court
    • The president
    • Current members
    • Former members
  • International relations
  • Publications
    • Official publications
  • Competences
  • Constitutional complaint
    • General information
    • FAQ
  • Translations/Summaries
  • Translations/Summaries 1990-2018
  • Agenda, sittings
  • Fundamental law
  • Act on the CC
  • Rules of procedure
  • About the hungarian legal system
  • News
  • Photo gallery
  • Leaflets
  • Press contact
  • Statistics
  • Client gate
  • Constitutional Court
    • About
      • Organisation
      • The office
      • History
    • Members of the court
      • The president
      • Current members
      • Former members
    • International relations
    • Publications
      • Official publications
  • Competences
    • Competences
    • Constitutional complaint
      • General information
      • FAQ
  • Case law
    • Translations/Summaries
    • Translations/Summaries 1990-2018
    • Agenda, sittings
  • Legal norms
    • Fundamental law
    • Act on the CC
    • Rules of procedure
    • About the hungarian legal system
  • Press
    • News
    • Photo gallery
    • Leaflets
    • Press contact
  • Data of public interest
    • Statistics
    • Client gate

Cases

Latest decisions

Decision 2/2019 on interpretation of the Fundamental Law

Decision 2/2019 on interpretation of the Fundamental Law

8 March 2019

Decision number: Decision 2/2019 (III. 5.)

Subject of the case:

Interpretation Article E) (2), Article R) (4), Article XIV (4) and Article 24 (1) of the Fundamental Law (transfer of competence to the European Union, group expulsion)

Open full text in PDF Data sheet of the case

On behalf of the Government of Hungary, the minister of justice submitted a motion to the Constitutional Court requesting the interpretation of the Fundamental Law concerning the relation between the Fundamental Law and the law of the European Union. The background of the case is that the European Commission sent an official notice to Hungary – in the framework of an infringement proceeding – in which it explained that according to the Commission’s interpretation the provisions of the Fundamental Law on asylum violate the relevant regulations of the European Union. The particular constitutional issue raised by the petitioner was the relation between the interpretation of the Fundamental Law by an organ of the European Union and the genuine interpretation provided by the Constitutional Court.The Constitutional Court pointed out: Hungary participates in the European Union in the interest of developing the European unity, for the purpose of expanding the freedom, prosperity and security of European nations. The Union law does not fit into the hierarchy of the domestic sources of law; it has been made part of the legal system by a constitutional order incorporated in the Fundamental Law. In most cases the parallel existence of Union law and domestic law does not cause any constitutional dilemma as the two normative systems are based on a common values. However, with regard to the assessment of certain national norms, the Constitutional Court and the European Union may reach different conclusions. Since the Fundamental Law requires compliance with the Union law, as a constitutional obligation, collisions may be resolved by paying respect to constitutional dialogue.However, the genuine interpretation of the Fundamental Law is the duty of the Constitutional Court and all organs or institutions shall respect it in their own procedures. The Constitutional Court has committed itself to constitutional dialogue: in the present case it interpreted the Fundamental Law in line with the so called Europe-friendliness by interpreting the content of the norm to also comply with the law of the European Union.Regarding asylum, the Constitutional Court underlined: the right to asylum is not the refugee’s individual subjective right and it stems from the international treaties undertaken by Hungary. A non-Hungarian national who arrived to the territory of Hungary through any country where he or she was not persecuted or directly threatened with persecution shall have a claim, protected as a fundamental right, to have his or her application assessed by the authority. It is the duty of the Parliament to determine and lay down in a cardinal Act the fundamental rules on granting asylum.Justices dr. Egon Dienes-Oehm, dr. István Stumpf, dr. Mária Szívós and dr. András Varga Zs. attached concurring reasonings, and Justices dr. Ágnes Czine, dr. Imre Juhász, dr. Béla Pokol and dr. László Salamon attached dissenting opinions to the decision.

Share:
A+ A-
Print view
Back to the top of page
1015 Budapest, Donáti u. 35-45., 1535 Budapest, Pf. 773.
(+36-1) 488 31 00 (+36-1) 212 11 70
Client Gate Contact

2022 © The Constitutional Court of Hungary

Impressum
Privacy statement
Sitemap