20 February 2018, plenary session

Agenda

– examination of the constitutional complaint against  Section 14 (10) of the Government Decree No. 43/1999. (III. 3.) Korm. on the  detailed rules of financing healthcare services from the Health Insurance Fund (overhead costs support for general practitioners) (IV/339/2017.)

 – examination of the constitutional complaint aimed at establishing the lack of conformity with the Fundamental Law and annulling Act CII of 2016 on Amending Certain Acts Related to Compensation (compensation auction) (IV/1002/2017.)

 

20 February 2018, first five member panel

Agenda:

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. Pfv.IV.21.633/2016/4 of the Curia (damages) (IV/1603/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. 17.K.27.022/2016/28 of the Nyíregyháza Administrative and Labour Court and the judgement No. Kfv.V.35.697/2016/4 of the Curia (taxation decision) (IV/1565/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. Pfv.IV.21.154/2016/4 of the Curia (protection of personal data) (IV/1123/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the ruling No. 1.Pkf.50.064/2017/3 of the Pécs Regional Court (deletion of implementing clause) (IV/1567/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. Kfv.II.37.264/2016/8 of the Curia (building permit) (IV/1141/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the text “during the proceedings this document may not be inspected” in Section 119(2) of the Act III of 1952 on the Civil Procedures (IV/1376/2017.)

 

20 February 2018, second five member panel

Agenda:

– examination of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. 53.Pf.630.924/2017/4 of the Budapest-Capital Regional Court (invalidity of a decision adopted by a condominium’s general assembly) (IV/1559/2017.)

– examination of the constitutional complaint against Section 8(7) of the Act CXXIII of 2015 on Primary Health Care, Section 1(2)a) and c), Section 2(1) and (2) of the Act II of 2000 on Independent Medical Activity and Section 2(1) and (3) of the Government Decree 313/2011. (XII. 23.) Korm. on the implementation of the Act II of 2000 on Independent Medical Activity (practice right) (IV/597/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the ruling No.3.Bpkf.47/2017/2 of the Kecskemét Regional Court (sequestration) (IV/1718/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint submitted against certain provisions of the Act XXIII of 2016 on Amending Certain Acts Concerning Working in the Retail Sector on Sundays (Sunday opening hours) (IV/1727/2016.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint submitted against certain provisions of the Act XXIII of 2016 on Amending Certain Acts Concerning Working in the Retail Sector on Sundays (Sunday opening hours) (IV/1700/2016.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. Bfv.II.1596/2016/17 of the Curia (slander) (IV/1904/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the ruling No. 23.Bpkf.10.362/2017/2 of the Budapest-Capital Regional Court (public figure; freedom of expression) (IV/2196/2017.)

 

20 February 2018, third five member panel

Agenda:

– examination of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. 3.K.32.053/2015/5 of the Budapest-Capital Administrative and Labour Court (right to sue, minority owner) (IV/247/2016.)

– examination of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. Kfv.III.37.641/2016/4 of the Curia and Section 69(4) of the Act CXXII of 2013 on Agricultural and Forestry Land Trade (land trade case) (IV/633/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the ruling No. 1400-Vh.178/2016/4 of the Budapest Environs Regional Court, the ruling No. 2201-3.Pkf.25.204/2017/2 of the Budapest-Capital Regional Court of Appeal, the ruling No. 1400-Vh.178/2016/7 of the Budapest Environs Regional Court, the ruling No. 2201-3.Pkf.25.205/2017/2 of the Budapest-Capital Regional Court of Appeal, the ruling No. 1400-Vh.178/2016/13 of the Budapest Environs Regional Court, the ruling No. 2201-3.Pkf.25.206/2017/2 of the Budapest-Capital Regional Court of Appeal and Section 36 of Vht (execution) (IV/1521/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. 18.P.50.762/2015/11 of the Central District Court of Pest and the judgement No. 61.Pf.634.816/2016/4 of the Budapest-Capital Regional Court (parking) (IV/545/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the complaint submitted against the judgement No. Kfv.IV.35.133/2016/3 of the Curia (area payment) (IV/1025/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the ruling No. 1.Bpk.23.046/2016/5 of the Central District Court of Pest and the ruling No. 25.Bpkf.7813/2017/2 of the Budapest-Capital Regional Court (defamation) (IV/1616/2017.)

 

13 February 2018, plenary session

Agenda:

– Examination of the Constitutional complaint against the ruling No. 2.Kpk.670.453/2017/4 of the Budapest-Capital Regional Court (local referendum case, party quarter, opening hours) (IV/2225/2017.)

Examination of the Constitutional complaint aimed at establishing the lack of conformity with the Fundamental Law and annulling the ruling No. Kfv.III.38.040/2016/2 of the Curia (right to legal remedy) (IV/728/2017.)

Examination of the Judicial initiative against Section 110 (6a) of the Act LIII of 1995 on the General Rules of Protecting the Environment and point 2.1.1 and point 2.2.1 of Annex 1 of the Government Decree No. 27/2008. (XII. 3.) Korm. on establishing the thresholds for environmental sound and vibration pollution (sound pollution – race course) (III/2197/2017.)

– examination of the constitutional complaint aimed at establishing the lack of conformity with the Fundamental Law and annulling the ruling No. 36.Kpk.45.927/2016/4 of the Budapest-Capital Administrative and Labour Court (change of name and legal gender reassignment, refugee) (IV/570/2017.)

– examination of the constitutional complaint aimed at establishing the lack of conformity with the Fundamental Law and annulling the ruling No. Knk.VII.37.392/2017/3 of the Curia (income of a person employed by a company in public ownership) (IV/1716/2017.)

 

13 February 2018, first five member panel

Agenda:

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the ruling No. Pfv.II.22.216/2017/13 of the Curia (wrongful retention of a child) (IV/237/2018.)

 

13 February 2018, second five member panel

Agenda:

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. 1.Pf.20.348/2017/6/II of the Budapest-Capital Regional Court of Appeal (violation of personality rights) (IV/1792/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No.18.P.50.392/2017/20 of the Central District Court of Pest (representation of condominium) (IV/1605/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. 18.P.50.391/2017/13 of the Central District Court of Pest (representation of condominium) (IV/1604/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. 53.Pf.630.924/2017/4 of the Budapest-Capital Regional Court (invalidity of a decision adopted by a condominium’s general assembly) (IV/1559/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the ruling No. 1.P.20.344/2016/6 of the Siófok District Court and ruling No. 1.Pkf.21.890/2016/2 of the Kaposvár Regional Court (payment order) (IV/1297/2017.)

– examination of the constitutional complaint against Section 8(7) of the Act CXXIII of 2015 on Primary Health Care, Section 1(2)a) and c), Section 2(1) and (2) of the Act II of 2000 on Independent Medical Activity and Section 2(1) and (3) of the Government Decree 313/2011. (XII. 23.) Korm. on the implementation of the Act II of 2000 on Independent Medical Activity (practice right) (IV/597/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. 17.Pf.20.259/2017/4-II of the Budapest-Capital Regional Court of Appeal (personality right) (IV/1608/2017.)

 

13 February 2018, third five member panel

Agenda:

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. 1.Pf.20.180/2015/7 of the Curia and the judgement No. 1.Pf.20.180/2015/7 of the Tatabánya Regional Court (payment of interests) (IV/1124/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the ruling No. Mfv.II.10.187/2016/2 of the Curia (time limit for review) (IV/1395/2016.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the ruling No. 8.Kpk.45.519/2017/6 of the Budapest-Capital Administrative and Labour Court (rejection to issue a visitors’ uniform visa) (IV/1688/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. Kfv.II.38.170/2016/17 of the Curia (obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based) (IV/1809/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. 7.Pf.20.534/2016/4 of the Budapest-Capital Regional Court of Appeal (public figure, using of recorded image) (IV/1665/2016.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. Pfv.IV.21.242/2016/6 of the Curia (violation of personality rights) (IV/1132/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against certain provisions of the Act CLI of 2011 on the Constitutional Court and the Constitutional Court’s Rules of Procedure (preparation process at the Constitutional Court) (IV/1580/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. Pfv.I.21.217/2016/4 of the Curia (use of private road) (IV/1699/2017.)

6 February 2018, plenary session

Agenda:

– examination of the constitutional complaint against Section 27(2)b) and bb) of the Act CXXII of 2013 on Agricultural and Forestry Land Trade (official approval of a contract of sale and purchase, land protection fine) (IV/1963/2016.)

− examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the ruling No. 2.Kpk.670.453/2017/4 of the Budapest-Capital Regional Court (local referendum case, party quarter, opening hours) (IV/2225/2017.)

– examination of the constitutional complaint aimed at establishing the lack of conformity with the Fundamental Law and annulling Section 4(4) and Section 62(1) of the Act CXVII of 1995 on Personal Income Tax – as in force on 9 June 2007 – (administrative decision adopted in a taxation case) (IV/680/2015.)

– examination of the constitutional complaint aimed at establishing the lack of conformity with the Fundamental Law and annulling the judgement No. Bfv.1812/2014/18 of the Curia (life imprisonment without the possibility of parole) (IV/2967/2015.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint aimed at establishing the lack of conformity with the Fundamental Law and annulling the ruling No. Kfv.III.38.040/2016/2 of the Curia (right to legal remedy) (IV/728/2017.)

 

6 February 2018, third five member panel

Agenda:

examination of the Constitutional complaint against the judgement No. 3.K.32.052/2015/5 of the Budapest-Capital Administrative and Labour Court (legal status of the client, verification of the entitlement to sue) (IV/355/2016.)

− examination of the constitutional complaint against  Section 14 (10) of the Government Decree No. 43/1999. (III. 3.) Korm. on the  detailed rules of financing healthcare services from the Health Insurance Fund (overhead costs support for general practitioners) (IV/339/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. Kfv.III.35.251/2015/7 of the Curia (presumption of innocence, presumption of responsibility) (IV/1089/2016.)

– examination of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. 9.K.28.268/2016/8 of the Szeged Administrative and Labour Court (review of a public administration decision, agricultural subsidy) (IV/2004/2016.)
– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. 2.Pf.20.083/2017/9 of the Eger Regional Court (prescription of execution) (IV/1903/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. 57.Pf.640.033/2016/5 of the Budapest-Capital Regional Court (damages) (IV/1467/2017.)

– examination of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. Pfv.V.20.444/2016/9 of the Curia (tender on the usufructuary lease of land) (IV/0057/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against  the text “and its approved or excluded purpose” Section 13(2)b) bc) of the Act LXXVIII of 1997 on the Formation and Protection of the Built Environment (building regulations) (IV/1288/2017.)

– examination of the judicial initiative against Section 110 (6a) of the Act LIII of 1995 on the General Rules of Protecting the Environment and point 2.1.1 and point 2.2.1 of Annex 1 of the Government Decree No. 27/2008. (XII. 3.) Korm. on establishing the thresholds for environmental sound and vibration pollution (sound pollution – race course) (III/2197/2017.)

– examination of the judicial initiative against Section 370/B of the Act III of 1952 on the Civil Procedures (invalidity of a foreign currency based loan contract) (III/2000/2017.)

 

 

6 February 2018, first five member panel

Agenda:

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the ruling No. Bfv.III.1.291/2016/10 of the Curia (embezzlement, changing the charges) (IV/1073/2017.)

– constitutional complaint against the ruling No. 4.Pkf.27.328/2016/2 of the Budapest-Capital Regional Court of Appeal (rejection of retrial) (IV/1204/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. 8.K.27.699/2016/13 of the Debrecen Administrative and Labour Court (review of a public administration decision, social service) (IV/1240/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. 10.K.27.698/2016/19 of the Debrecen Administrative and Labour Court (review of a public administration decision, social service) (IV/1178/2017.)

– constitutional complaint against the judgement No. Pfv.IV.20.919/2016/6 of the Curia (protection of personal data) (IV/1122/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. 2.Bf.533/2016/9 of the Debrecen Regional Court (court-appointed attorney) (IV/1028/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. 6.K.31.913/2016/7 of the Budapest-Capital Administrative and Labour Court and Section 26(1) of the Act XXXIV of 1991 on Organising Gambling (operation of vending machine, gambling) (IV/1420/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. 3.K.32.539/2016/5 of the Budapest-Capital Administrative and Labour Court and Section 26(1) of the Act XXXIV of 1991 on Organising Gambling (operation of vending machine, gambling) (IV/1075/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. 13.K.34.461/2015/7 of the Budapest-Capital Administrative and Labour Court and Section 26(1) of the Act XXXIV of 1991 on Organising Gambling (operation of vending machine, gambling) (IV/272/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. 13.K.31.757/2016/3of the Budapest-Capital Administrative and Labour Court and Section 26(1) of the Act XXXIV of 1991 on Organising Gambling (operation of vending machine, gambling) (IV/271/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. 13.K.30.723/2016/4 of the Budapest-Capital Administrative and Labour Court and Section 26(1) of the Act XXXIV of 1991 on Organising Gambling (operation of vending machine, gambling) (IV/270/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. 10.K.32.086/2016/5 of the Budapest-Capital Administrative and Labour Court (mediatory activity to grant participation in gambling) (IV/224/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the ruling No. 29.Szef.81/2016/2 of the Budapest-Capital Regional Court (failure to serve a ruling) (IV/749/2017.)

 

30 January 2018, plenary session

Agenda:

— Examination of the constitutional complaint aimed at establishing the lack of conformity with the Fundamental Law and annulling the interlocutory judgement No. Pfv.VI.21.031/2016/2 of the Curia (failure to hold a trial) (IV/1634/2016.)

 — Examination of the constitutional complaint aimed at establishing the lack of conformity with the Fundamental Law and annulling the ruling No. Bfv.III.169/2017/2 of the Curia (unfair procedure; entitlement of the supplementary private prosecutor to submit a motion for review) (IV/1060/2017.)

 — Examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the ruling No. 2.Kpk.670.453/2017/4 of the Budapest-Capital Regional Court (local referendum case, party quarter, opening hours) (IV/2225/2017.)

30 January 2018, second five member panel

Agenda:

— Examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. Kfv.VI.35.715/2016/6 of the Curia (acquiring a direct qualifying holding of 20%) (IV/1566/2017.)

 – examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. Pfv.IV.21.475/2016/4 of the Curia (disclosure of data of public interest) (IV/1197/2017.)

 – examination of the judicial initiative against Section 23(1)b) of the Council of Ministers’ Decree No. 26/1987. (VII. 30.) MT on the implementation of the Act I of 1987 and Section 19(1)b) of the Joint Decree No. 6/1987. (IX.01.) ÉVM-MÉM-IM-PM on regulating certain questions related to the management of real estates owned by the State and to private individuals’ ownership of houses, holiday homes, residential plots and arable lands (building over, restriction in a decree of the essential content of a fundamental right) (IV/2007/2017)

 – examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the decision No. Köf.5049/2016/7 of the Local Government Council of the Curia and Section 9(3)3 of the Decree No. 21/2013. (XII. 2.) of the Local Government of Mohács on local taxes (local tax) (IV/1788/2017)

 – examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against Section 170 of the Act II of 2012 on Offences, the Procedure in Relation to Offences and the Offence Record System and the ruling No. 23.Szef.27/2017/3 of the Budapest-Capital Regional Court (freedom of expression) (IV/1554/2017.)

 

23 January 2018, plenary session

Agenda:

− Examination of the constitutional complaint aimed at establishing the lack of conformity with the Fundamental Law and annulling the interlocutory judgement No. Pfv.VI.21.031/2016/2 of the Curia (failure to hold a trial) (IV/1634/2016.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint aimed at establishing the lack of conformity with the Fundamental Law and annulling the ruling No. Bfv.III.169/2017/2 of the Curia (unfair procedure; entitlement of the supplementary private prosecutor to submit a motion for review) (IV/1060/2017.)

− Examination of the constitutional complaint aimed at establishing the lack of conformity with the Fundamental Law and annulling the ruling No. Bfv.I.1456/2014/4 of the Curia (sentencing) IV/987/2015.

-examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint aimed at establishing the lack of conformity with the Fundamental Law and annulling Section 3(5) of the Act CXII of 2011 on the Right of Informational Self-determination and the Freedom of Information and the judgement No. 2.Pf.20.123/2016/6/II of the Budapest-Capital Regional Court of Appeal (disclosing data of public interest) (IV/1510/2016.)

− Examination of the constitutional complaint against the ruling No. 22.Bpk.31.158/2015/3 of the Central District Court of Pest and the ruling No. 27.Bpkf.11.103/2015/2 of the Budapest-Capital Regional Court (slander) (IV/119/2016.)

23 January 2018, second five member panel

Agenda:

– examination of the Judicial initiative against Section 606/B para. (1) item c) of the Act XIX of 1998 on the Criminal Procedure (excluding a judge from the subsequent handling of the criminal case) (III/1989/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the ruling No. 2.Kpk.670.453/2017/4 of the Budapest-Capital Regional Court (local referendum case, party quarter, opening hours) (IV/2225/2017.)

– examination of the Constitutional complaint against the judgement No. Pfv.IV.20.750/2016/8 of the Curia (publicity of a policeman’s image) (IV/2057/2016.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. Mfv.III.10.659/2016/4 of the Curia (review of rehabilitation procedure) (IV/1225/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. Pfv.III.21.089/2016/8 of the Curia (damages against the State of Hungary) (IV/1409/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. Kfv.VI.35.734/2016/10 of the Curia (taxation) (IV/1332/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. Kfv.VI.35.715/2016/6 of the Curia (acquiring a direct qualifying holding of 20%) (IV/1566/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the ruling No. 7. Kpk.27.005/2016/10 of the Gyula Administrative and Labour Court and the ruling No. 9.Kpkf.25.133/2017/3 of the Gyula Regional Court (obligation to conduct an official public administration procedure, apiary) (IV/1356/2017.)

 

16 January 2018, Plenary Session

Agenda:

– examination of the constitutional complaint aimed at establishing the lack of conformity with the Fundamental Law and annulling the interlocutory judgement No. Pfv.VI.21.031/2016/2 of the Curia (failure to hold a trial) (IV/1634/2016.)

– examination of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. 13.Bhar.154/2016/15 of the Budapest-Capital Regional Court of Appeal (slander) (IV/1017/2017.)

– examination of the petition for posterior norm control submitted against Section 1 (2), Section 2 (2) and (5), Section 4 (2) of the Act LXXVI of 2017 on the Transparency of Organisations Receiving Foreign Funds and against Section 94 (1) h) and Section 95 e) of the Act CLXXXI of 2011 on the Court Registration of Civil Society Organisations and Related Rules of Proceeding (civil society organisation receiving foreign funds) (II/1460/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint aimed at establishing the lack of conformity with the Fundamental Law and annulling the ruling No. Bfv.III.169/2017/2 of the Curia (unfair procedure; entitlement of the supplementary private prosecutor to submit a motion for review) (IV/1060/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint aimed at establishing the lack of conformity with the Fundamental Law and annulling the ruling No. Pfv.IV.21.906/2016/3 of the Curia (violation of personality rights) (IV/1333/2017.)

16 January 2018, first five member panel

Agenda:

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the ruling No. 29.Szef.81/2016/2 of the Budapest-Capital Regional Court (failure to serve a ruling) (IV/749/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. Pfv.IV.21.425/2016/5 of the Curia (notification on handling personal data) (IV/1154/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the ruling No. 14.Bf.157/2016/19 of the Budapest-Capital Regional Court of Appeal (deduction of detention carried out abroad) (IV/1338/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the ruling No. 18.Bpkf.87/2017/2 of the Debrecen Regional Court (defamation) (IV/1452/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. Mfv.I.10.397/2016/4 of the Curia (delimitations of the application for review) (IV/1538/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the ruling No. 27.Bpkf.13.153/2016/2 of the Budapest-Capital Regional Court (misdemeanor of defamation) (IV/1010/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the ruling No. 22.Bpk.31.158/2015/3 of the Central District Court of Pest and the ruling No. 27.Bpkf.11.103/2015/2 of the Budapest-Capital Regional Court (slander) (IV/119/2016.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against Section 61/A of the Government Decree No. 290/2011. (XII. 22.) Korm. on the implementation of certain provisions of the Act CXIII of 2011 on National Defence and the Hungarian Defence Forces and on specific measures that may be implemented during any special legal order, and Section 1 of the Government Decree No. 457/2016. (XII. 23.) Korm. on the compensation of the staff of law enforcement bodies (damages of aggrieved parties in the BUDA-CASH case) (IV/1422/2017.)

16 January 2018, second five member panel

Agenda: 

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the ruling No. 3.Bf.1205/2015/8 of the Budapest Environs Regional Court (failure to take note of documentary evidence) (IV/1281/2016.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the ruling No. 5.Bnyf.264/2017/2 of the Szeged Regional Court (sequestration) (IV/1226/2017.)

– examination of the admission of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. Kfv.I.35.586/2016/6 of the Curia (taxation) (IV/1820/2017.)

– examination of the admission of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. 25.K.30.643/2015/10 of the Budapest-Capital Administrative and Labour Court and the judgement No. Kfv.V.35819/2015/11 of the Curia (taxation) (IV/260/2017.)

– examination of the admission of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. Pfv.IV.20.679/2016/5 of the Curia (disclosure of data of public interest) (IV/1926/2016.)

– examination of the judicial initiative against Section 606/B para. (1) item c) of the Act XIX of 1998 on the Criminal Procedure (excluding a judge from the subsequent handling of the criminal case) (III/1989/2017.)

– examination of the judicial initiative against Section 112 (1) of the Act CCIV of 2011 on the National Higher Education (termination of the student’s legal relation) (III/2074/2017.)

– examination of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. Pfv.IV.20.750/2016/8 of the Curia (publicity of a policeman’s image) (IV/2057/2016.)

16 January 2018, third five member panel

Agenda:

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against  Section 14 (10) of the Government Decree No. 43/1999. (III. 3.) Korm. on the  detailed rules of financing healthcare services from the Health Insurance Fund (overhead costs support for general practitioners) (IV/339/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. Gfv.VII.30.201/2015/6 of the Curia (rules of selling assets in the procedure of liquidation, economic entity of strategic importance) (IV/344/2016.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. 3.K.32.052/2015/5 of the Budapest-Capital Administrative and Labour Court (legal status of the client, verification of the entitlement to sue) (IV/355/2016.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the ruling No. 2.Mpkf.22.037/2016/2 of the Kaposvár Regional Court and against the decision No. 4/2003. PJE of the Curia (request for excuse) (IV/1008/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. Mfv.I.10.560/2015/4 of the Curia (dismissal without reasoning of a government official) (IV/1904/2016.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. 5.G.40.717/2012/84 of the Economic Judicial College of the Budapest-Capital Regional Court and judgement No. 13.Gf.40.167/2016/5-III. of the Budapest-Capital Regional Court of Appeal (obligatory purchase of a real estate) (IV/2111/2016.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. 5.G.40.717/2012/84 of the Economic Judicial College of the Budapest-Capital Regional Court and judgement No. 13.Gf.40.167/2016/5-III. of the Budapest-Capital Regional Court of Appeal (obligatory purchase of a real estate) (IV/571/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. 4.Pf.21.367/2016/4 of the Szolnok Regional Court (termination of execution, invalidity of contract) (IV/1421/2017.)