9 July 2019. Plenary session

– examination of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. 2.Pf.20.009/2018/4/II of the Budapest-Capital Regional Court of Appeal (violation of personality right) (IV/1170/2018.)

– examination of the constitutional complaint aimed at establishing the lack of conformity with the Fundamental Law and annulling the judgement No. 13.Pf.20.706/2014/6 of the Szekszárd Regional Court of Appeal (disclosing data of public interest, Paks Nuclear Power Plant) (IV/1722/2015.)

examination of the judicial initiative aimed at establishing the lack of conformity with the Fundamental Law and annulling Section 44/A (1) ba), bb) and (2) of the Act III of 1993 on Social Administration and Social Benefits (old age support for persons engaged in providing permanent care) (III/1716/2018.)

examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. Pfv.IV.21.039/2017/4 of the Curia (violation of the right to image) (IV/1224/2018.)

examination of the posterior norm control submitted for establishing the lack of conformity with the Fundamental Law and annulling Section 22(1), Section 24/A and Section 29 of the Act CXIII of 1996 on Housing Savings Banks (termination of State support for the housing savings constructions) (II/1712/2018.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint aimed at establishing the lack of conformity with the Fundamental Law and annulling the ruling No. Bfv.III.914/2017/13 of the Curia (criminal case, ECHR decision) (IV/13/2018.)

examination of the constitutional complaint against the ruling No. 40.Kpk.45.241/2017/2 of the Budapest-Capital Administrative and Labour Court (judicial review of the tax authority’s ruling) (IV/1540/2017.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint aimed at establishing the lack of conformity with the Fundamental Law and annulling the judgement No. Pfv.VI.22.318/2017/7 of the Curia (pre-emption right) (IV/339/2019.)

examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the ruling No. 2.Kpkf.670.489/2018/3 of the Budapest-Capital Regional Court and Section 1 (6) of the Act LXVI of 2011 on the State Audit Office (auditing political parties receiving budgetary support)