10 November, third five-member panel

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against Section 327 of the Act III of 1952 on the Civil Procedure, Section 12 (1) of the Act  CXL of 2004 on Public Administration Procedure, Section 47 (1) of the Act CXXXIX of 2013 on the National Bank of Hungary and the judgement No. I.35.466/2017/10 of the Curia (supervision of savings bank) (IV/1331/2018.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. Kfv.I.35.384/2019/12 of the Curia (taxation) (IV/1077/2020.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. 1.Pf.21.653/2019/6 of the Kecskemét Regional Court (termination of execution, invalidity of foreign currency-based contract) (IV/1073/2020.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the ruling No. Bpkf.II.148/2020/2 of the Curia (admissibility of retrial) (IV/629/2020.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the ruling No. Kfv.VI.38.356/2019/2 of the Curia (regulation of contacts with grandparents) (IV/1876/2019.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. Kfv.VI.37.725/2018/4 of the Curia (rejection of benefits) (IV/1243/2019.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the judgement No. Kfv.I.35.710/2018/7 of the Curia (review of a tax authority decision) (IV/871/2020.)

– examination of the admissibility of the constitutional complaint against the local government decree No. 29/2015. (XI. 27.) of Budapest-Capital District IV Újpest Municipality Assembly of Representatives and the judgement No. 34.K.30.121/2019/4 of the Budapest-Capital Administrative and Labour Court (local government decree) (IV/992/2019.)